Outdated and Oppressive: Why Countries Should Abandon Undecency Laws

R.A. Sterling
3 min readFeb 4, 2025

In an era where human rights and personal freedoms are at the forefront of progressive discussions, it is baffling that many countries still uphold archaic undecency laws. These regulations, often rooted in outdated moralistic perspectives, criminalize individuals based on their clothing choices — or lack thereof. The human body is natural; everyone has one. It is time for governments to recognize that modesty is a mindset, not a dress code, and that the true measure of decency lies in intent, not appearance.

File:A woman facing the sea.jpg Wikimedia Commons https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:A_woman_facing_the_sea.jpg

A Legacy of Control

Undecency laws have long been tools of social control, dictating how individuals — particularly women — should present themselves in public. These laws vary widely, from banning toplessness to criminalizing public nudity under the guise of maintaining ‘public morality.’ However, the very notion of morality being tied to the human form is flawed. Societies that promote body shaming and over-sexualization of natural anatomy perpetuate a culture of guilt and repression rather than one of respect and understanding.

Modesty is Not About Clothes

One of the most significant misconceptions surrounding nudity is the idea that it is inherently immodest or inappropriate. Modesty, in its true form, is about humility, respect, and personal boundaries — it is a state of mind, not a fabric requirement. Different cultures and historical periods have had widely varying standards of dress, proving that societal norms are fluid and subjective. The belief that covering the body equates to decency is an arbitrary social construct rather than a universal truth.

Nudity Without Harm: The Role of Intent

Critics of public nudity often argue that allowing people to be unclothed in public will lead to disorder or moral decay. However, the issue is not nudity itself but the intent behind it. If nudity is expressed in an artistic, cultural, or non-harmful manner, then criminalizing it is an unjust restriction of personal freedom. Laws should focus on preventing acts of harassment, exploitation, or harm — issues that exist independently of whether a person is clothed or not.

A Shift Toward Progress

Many progressive nations have already begun to dismantle these oppressive laws. Countries like Spain, Denmark, and even certain U.S. states recognize that public nudity, when not linked to harmful behavior, is a personal freedom rather than a criminal offense. These places have not descended into chaos; rather, they have fostered societies that respect personal choices and bodily autonomy.

The Path Forward

If societies truly value freedom and equality, they must stop dictating morality through outdated dress codes. Governments should repeal undecency laws and instead emphasize laws that address real crimes, such as harassment, assault, and exploitation. By shifting the focus from appearance to intent, we create a culture that respects individual autonomy while maintaining ethical standards.

The human body is not shameful. Everyone has one. It is time we stop criminalizing nature and start fostering a world where people are judged by their actions, not their attire.

--

--

R.A. Sterling
R.A. Sterling

Written by R.A. Sterling

My name is Rhodes Ansel Sterling, author name R.A. Sterling. Themes: space colonization, the environment, and women’s rights. amazon.com/author/rasterling

No responses yet